LBST 320: Medieval and Renaissance Thought: Imagination, Reason, Faith

Course Outline (Spring 2014)

The core courses in Liberal Studies involve the study of a contributions made to the Western tradition from a number of disciplines, including art, music, philosophy, literature, science, and history. But the goal of the Liberal Studies Program is not to produce artists, musicians, philosophers, literary critics, scientists, or historians. Instead, it is designed to help you respond intelligently to the whole range of human intellectual endeavour. We seek what every good liberal education seeks: not the knowledge of the technical expert but the understanding of the informed generalist, the well-educated citizen, who can grasp the essence of complex questions and see subjects in their relationship to each other. The Liberal Studies Program aims to develop the understanding of a liberated, empowered mind, an understanding that results in better knowledge of ourselves, appreciation for others, and reasoned judgements about how we ought to live.

In LBST 320 we will examine some deeply influential works and ideas from the medieval and renaissance periods of European thought. Medieval thinkers engaged in a remarkably diverse dialogue about the nature of, and relationship between, faith and reason and did so in ways that can be quite startling to contemporary readers; the Renaissance deepened this conversation and furthered a medieval concern with the imagination by returning to classical sources of learning in a remarkably original and productive fashion. We seek to engage in some significant parts of these cultural conversations through reading select original texts. In doing so, we have a dual goal in mind: understanding something of the intellectual nature of the eras and thinking about the relevance of the sometimes startling ideas and art forms we will encounter for ourselves today.

Things To Do Before the First Class (Nanaimo students):

Read this Course Outline carefully.
Read The Letter of Paul to the Romans and The Gospel According to John (in the New Testament of the Bible).
Prepare your seminar note on one of these readings and submit it to VIU Learn(D2L) before the start of your seminar (see below for instructions on writing the seminar note).

Things To Do Before the First Class (Duncan and Powell River students):

Read this Course Outline carefully.
Read The Letter of Paul to the Romans and The Gospel According to John (in the New Testament of the Bible).
View the lecture on VIU Learn(D2L) sometime between Tuesday afternoon and the Thursday evening seminar.
Prepare your seminar note on one of these above readings and submit it to VIU Learn(D2L) before the start of your Thursday night seminar (see below for instructions on writing the seminar note).

Things To Do Before the First Class (Courtenay students):

Read this Course Outline carefully.
Sign on to the course VIU Learn(D2L) site and view the images of renaissance art.
Prepare your seminar note on one or several of these images and bring it to your Tuesday evening seminar (see below for instructions on writing the seminar note).

Class Times and Dates

Please note that Students in Courtenay, Duncan and Powell River are not required to come to the lecture in Nanaimo; the lecture will be made available via streaming video for you. If you are in town during the lecture time, you are more than welcome to attend. Also, please note that seminars N02, D01, and R01 will be linked via video-conferencing technology.

Lecture	Tue 10:30-12:30	Team	Nanaimo, bld. 355, rm. 107
Seminar S14N01	Tue & Thu 1:00-2:30	Mark Blackell	Nanaimo, bld 355, rm. 108
Seminar S14N02	Thu 6:00-9:00	Mark Blackell	Nanaimo, bld. 305, rm. 274 (video-conference room)
Seminar S14D01	Thu 6:00-9:00	Mark Blackell	Cowichan, 700/135 (video-conference room)
Seminar S14R01	Thu 6:00-9:00	Mark Blackell	Powell River 610/152 (video-conference room)
Seminar S14X01	Tue 6:30-9:30	Maureen Okun	Class held in Courtenay, Discovery 204

Professors' Office Hours

	Office Hours (until April 14, 2014)	Office	Phone
Mark Blackell	Mon., Wed., and Thur., 12-1 PM, and by appointment	Nanaimo, 355/332	753-3245, #2173
Maureen Okun	Thursdays from 1:30 to 3:30, and by appointment	Nanaimo, 355/334	753-3245, #2174

Attendance

Please note: because of the essential participatory nature of Liberal Studies courses, it is Department policy that attendance is required at all classes. Failure to attend regularly will have a significant negative impact on your mark for participation. All students in Nanaimo seminars are required to attend the Thursday morning Lectures, where attendance will be taken.

The Liberal Studies Department prohibits audio- or video-taping of seminars , except in cases where this is a required accommodation. Students with documented disabilities requiring academic and/or exam accommodation should contact Accessibility Services, Building 200, or call 740-6446.

Booklist

Please note: where selections are not indicated, we will be reading the entire primary text (i.e. not the editorial or secondary material, which is optional).

Augustine, Confessions , trans. Chadwick, Oxford World's Classics, ISBN: 9780192817747. Selections: Books 1-5 and 7 (complete); also Book 8, pages 144-154 and Book 9, pages 170-174.
The Bible (any edition): Paul's Letter to the Romans and The Gospel According to John.
Dante, Inferno , trans. Musa, Penguin Classics, ISBN: 9780142437223.
Defoe, Robinson Crusoe, ed. Davis, Broadview Press, ISBN: 9781551119359.
Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy, trans. Ian Johnston, Broadview Press, ISBN: 9781554811526.
Machiavelli, The Prince, trans. Adams, Norton Critical Edition, ISBN: 9780393962208.
Marlowe, Doctor Faustus, ed. Michael Keefer, Broadview Press, ISBN: 9781551112107.
Montaigne, Michel de, trans MA Screech, The Complete Essays of Montaigne , Penguin, ISBN: 9780140446043. Selections: "We reach the same means by discrepant means" (3-6), "That it is madness to judge the true and the false from our own capacities" (200-204), "On the Cannibals" (228-241), "On repenting" (907-921), and "On experience" (1207-1269).
Murray, Peter, and Linda Murray, Art of the Renaissance, Thames and Hudson, ISBN: 9780500200087.
Sells, Michael, Approaching the Qu 'ran, White Cloud Press, ISBN: 9781883991692.
Shakespeare, The Tempest, ed. Peter Holland, Penguin, ISBN: 9780140714852.
Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, trans. Winny, Broadview Press, ISBN: 9780921149927.

Web Resources

There are a number of valuable and helpful web resources for your use in LBST 320:

1) The Liberal Studies Homepage: this departmental page contains a vast amount of information about the theory and practice of Liberal Studies courses, and all the links you will need to other resources. Please explore it at your leisure: www.viu.ca/liberalstudies/ . Take especial note of the links under the "Current Students" tab.

2) Helpful advice on essay writing and other aspects of study is available at " johnstonia " - the homepage of Ian Johnston, one of the founding professors of Liberal Studies and now a Research Associate in the Liberal Studies Department. To reach this instructional material, go to records.viu.ca/~johnstoi/ and follow the links to "General Study Materials." We recommend especially Essays and Arguments and Participating in Seminars .

4) There is a Facebook group created by the Liberal Studies Club for all those involved in Liberal Studies: it is called VIU Liberal Studies and is listed under Student Groups - General at www.facebook.com. Use it to stay in touch with other students, past and present. The Liberal Studies Club is a student-run organisation which aims to help students get the most out of their experience in the program.

Assignments and Grades

Participation (seminar participation and lecture attendance or viewing)	25%
Short Essay	15%
Final Exam	20%
10 Seminar Notes	15%
Long Essay	20%
Presentation at end-of-year conference	5%

Short Essay:

The short essay will focus closely upon one of the readings to be discussed in the seminar. There is a procedure to follow:

Select some material to write on: in the first week you will receive a list of questions on the material for each of the weeks in the term; think about which of the weekly readings you would like to write on. (Make sure that VIU has your correct email address, in case we need to email additional potential questions during the term).
Write your first draft: write the essay in time to hand it in at or before the first seminar after the week in which we read the material you are writing on. Students in Nanaimo and Courtenay must submit their essays in paper form. Students in Powell River and Duncan will have to submit drafts and final papers via the course D2L site prior to the seminar.
Final draft: The seminar leader will make comments on the first draft and assign a provisional mark. Revise and resubmit the essay, along with the copy annotated by your seminar leader (that is if you have a paper copy -- not needed if the first draft was sent back to you in electronic form), to your seminar leader a week after the original deadline. Please note, your grade will not increase much, if at all, if your revisions consist in only correcting the grammatical and other errors flagged by your instructor.

The short essay should be approximately 1000 words long; it is not to be a research paper but a thoughtful response to particular topics in the core reading. The essay must consist of a convincing argument, with textual evidence (using MLA style referencing -- see http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/01/ for details), for a thesis which captures your own point of view and constitutes an answer to the question selected. No reading other than the study material of the week is required before you write the essay.

Seminar Notes:

At or before the start of the first (or only) seminar of the week you must hand in some notes (200-300 words) on the text (or one of the texts) under discussion for that week. Please submit these notes via VIU Learn (D2L) before the seminar begins. The main purpose of these seminar notes is to encourage students to engage in critical reflection on the text under discussion and to have at least one thoughtful contribution to offer to the seminar.

Although it must be written in complete sentences, the note is not an essay; it need not have a thesis statement, conventionally designed paragraphs, and so on. Unlike polished essays, seminar notes can be speculative and can take more intellectual risks. The best seminar notes focus on a single aspect of a work rather than making generalizations about its entirety. Choose a feature that engages or puzzles you, and explore its possibilities.

In writing these notes, please keep in mind some important guidelines: a) the notes should ask a question about some significant point with respect to the text, a question that takes one into the text rather than away from it, which addresses interpretative issues rather than matters of fact or context which cannot be answered solely by reading the text; b) avoid making a list of many points, and stay firmly focused on one; c) avoid a mere summary or description of the text; and d) don't make each note simply a personal response (e.g., an indication of whether you liked or didn't like the work). The instructors will be looking for evidence of engagement with the text, as well as attentive reading and thoughtful consideration. You may find, also, that your note can suggest an interesting topic for the rest of the class to explore in seminar discussion.

Students in Duncan (section D01), Powell River (section R01), and Courtenay (section X01), will be watching the lecture via streaming-video and their seminar notes have two components : one part of the seminar note requires a response to the assigned reading, as described above, and a second part, of about 100 extra words, requires a response to the week's lecture. Respond to something in the lecture and do so in a manner that also demonstrates that you have viewed the lecture. This second component is important for your participation grade.

Ten (10) notes are required (one per week for 10 of the 12 weeks we have material to discuss) and each note will be given a pass or fail grade with comments and returned to the student.

Seminar Participation:

Participation is a critical part of this program, and the skills of intellectual discussion among the most important it endeavours to foster. Some of the criteria for good performance in a seminar are explained in the Advice on Seminar Participation at http://records.viu.ca/~johnstoi/seminars.htm ; you should read this if possible before the first seminar.

The most important components in the assessment of your performance in the seminar are the following: attendance, preparation for the seminar (usually required reading and seminar note), and quality and quantity of your participation in the discussion (factors which include your contributions to creating and sustaining a worthwhile and well-mannered seminar conversation for all participants). Note that mere frequency of contribution is not necessarily an all-important factor. You are expected to listen well and to encourage others to contribute.

If you know that you are going to have to miss a seminar, you should offer an acceptable reason to your professor in advance; anyone who misses a seminar without giving a reason should speak to the professor before the next seminar. Note that, in exceptional circumstances, it is possible for a student to make up a missed seminar, for example, by attending one at a different time.

The seminar experience is absolutely central to what Liberal Studies 320 is trying to achieve, and we are very concerned to see that students all contribute effectively, especially those who may still find themselves somewhat reluctant to speak up in a group discussion. The principle is that we learn best from discussion of important ideas with one another: those who do not contribute to seminar are reaping the benefits without contributing anything of benefit to others. Still, some people are naturally shy; if you still find this a problem after the first few weeks, you should discuss the matter thoroughly with the seminar leader so that together you can work out some ways of resolving the difficulties.

The following scale gives a guide to the factors the seminar leader will consider in evaluating seminar participation, as well as a rough picture of their impact on your mark:

F: is physically absent without a valid reason;
D: has written a seminar note and is physically present, but otherwise quite absent;
C-: provides some potentially useful participation, but is very poorly prepared or insensitive or uncooperative in the group setting;
C: is present, evidently prepared and interested, but offers quite limited verbal contributions to the discussion;
C+ to B-: is present, well prepared, and offers some useful comments (which might be more incisive or more relevant or further developed);
B to B+: is present, very well prepared, maintains a good relationship with the others (i.e., contributes actively to the dynamics of the seminar), and offers useful comments in a constructive way;
A range: makes a major contribution and not just to the understanding of the material but to the social dynamics of the session, a contribution which would be difficult to imagine being much better.

The lectures serve to introduce the texts that will be the main focus of the seminars later on. As such, the lectures are important for you to attend as part of your preparation for seminar. Often the lectures will establish points that the seminars will discuss in more detail.

Long Essay:

At the end of the semester, we will hold, in conjunction with the fourth year of the program, an academic conference featuring a guest speaker and small-group presentations by students. Fourth-year students will present their Senior Projects; you will present your Long Essay, a paper of approximately 3,000 words on a topic agreed between you and your instructor, a topic bearing some relationship to material from LBST 320. It must display original thought against the background of scholarship in the area chosen. References to research outside the scope of the courses must be explained in sufficient detail to be comprehensible to the intelligent layperson. You must have your thesis statement approved in advance by your instructor, who will act as advisor during the writing of the Essay. The Long Essay assignment includes a number of stages:

a) Topic proposals: Topic proposals for the Long Essay will be due by January 28th and will explain, in approximately one page, what your topic is, what question or questions you are seeking to examine, and what texts you will be looking at. You may choose your own topic and question, or you may choose one of the questions from the list of questions we provide for the short essay. If you choose a question we provide, try to choose one that will allow you to do some research. In addition, you must choose a different topic and text or set of texts for the Long essay than you write on for the Short Essay.

b) Outline: An outline of the Long Essay is due by February 18th. The outline should contain the following:

The (at least, tentative) thesis for which you intend to argue
A more elaborate re-working of the Topic Proposal that narrows it down into a focused thesis and is more specific about the questions you will explore and the works you intend to use
A detailing of the sections into which the essay will be divided, and the purpose of each section
A working Bibliography with at least three academic secondary sources in it.

c) Draft: A draft of the Long Essay is due by March 18th. It will be returned to you with comments to rework for the final version of the paper.

The draft, outline, and topic proposal together will be given a mark for 5% of your final grade, and this mark will be based on the quality, thoroughness, and timeliness of your work on these three preparatory exercises.

d) Final Long Essay: Due by April 10, and worth 25% of your final grade.

e) Conference presentation: You will give a presentation on your Long Essay at the Liberal Studies Spring Conference held from April 9-11 at the Nanaimo Campus. The presentation, lasting approximately 10 minutes and worth 5% of your total grade, should be a condensed version of your paper.

Final Exam

The exam, set during the official exam period, will consist of an essay question on some theme in the course (with a selection of questions from which that one question will be chosen given out in advance) and some short answer questions that will evaluate your knowledge of the reading material and/or lectures.

General Writing Requirements

Word-Processing: All written work should be typed or printed at font size 12, double spaced on standard paper (8.5" x 11") with the right justification removed if your printer does not provide proportional spacing. The title page should clearly identify the writer, course, instructor name, assignment title, question answered (if applicable), and date submitted.

Plagiarism: You should be familiar with the policy on academic misconduct outlined in the Vancouver Island University Calendar and take care to avoid such practices. Plagiarism consists in passing off the work or ideas of others as your own. It ranges from word-for-word copying from other sources to summarizing their content in one's own words, when this is done without acknowledgement. When you do borrow from other people, you must indicate the source to the fullest extent possible. Otherwise, you will incur severe penalties for intellectual dishonesty: a plagiarised paper will normally receive a mark of zero, and the student will not have an opportunity to make up the assignment. A second occurrence will normally result in a mark of F for the course, and further disciplinary action may be taken by the VIU authorities.

Students should be aware that plagiarism is surprisingly easy to detect and expose. They should also be aware that professors have at their disposal powerful Internet tools which enable them easily to detect sources which have been plagiarised from the Web. If you are at all unclear as to what constitutes plagiarism, please speak to your professor.

Appropriate Language: Wherever appropriate, students should follow good contemporary practice and use gender-free language in their writing and speech. (Where absurd, however, such practice should be avoided: e.g. "Aristotle expresses his or her views about friendship in Books 8 and 9 of the Nicomachean Ethics .")

Outline of Main Topics – Nanaimo, Duncan, and Powell River Students

Please note that Seminar N01 has a Tuesday and a Thursday Seminar with the following reading schedule. The other seminars are all on Thursday from 6-9 PM and you should read all of the material for that week for that seminar time.

Week of (Tue)	Tuesday Lecture	Tuesday Seminar (see note above)	Thursday Seminar (see note above)
Jan 7	Christianity: The narrative of exit and return (Maureen and Mark)	The Gospel According to John	Paul's Letter to the Romans
Jan 14	Augustine: A journey of reason and faith (Mark)	Augustine: Confessions (s ee the 'Booklist' section above for selections)	Augustine: Confessions (see the 'Booklist' section above for selections)
Jan 21	Islam and The Qur'an (Mark)	Approaching The Qur'an	Approaching The Qur'an
Jan 28	Meister Eckhart and Medieval Art (Maureen)	Meister Eckhart (see the D2L site for readings)	Medieval Art Images (to be provided via D2L)
Feb 4	Sir Gawain and the Green Knight (Maureen)	Sir Gawain and the Green Knight	Sir Gawain and the Green Knight
Feb 11	Dante's Journey to Hell (Maureen)	Dante: Inferno	Dante: Inferno
Feb 18	Machiavelli (Mark)	The Prince	The Prince
Feb 25	STUDY WEEK	STUDY WEEK	STUDY WEEK
Mar 4	Montaigne and Renaissance Art (Mark)	Montaigne, Essays (selections t.b.a)	Art of the Renaissance (selections t.b.a.)
Mar 11	Marlowe and Galileo (Maureen)	Marlowe, Dr Faustus	Galileo, "Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina" (see D2L for reading)
Mar 18	Shakespeare (Maureen)	The Tempest	The Tempest
Mar 25	Descartes: an Interior Journey (Mark)	Meditations on First Philosophy	Meditations on First Philosophy
Apr 1	Daniel Defoe: Voyage into Homo Economicus (Janice Porteous)	Robinson Crusoe	Robinson Crusoe
Apr 8-10	CONFERENCE	CONFERENCE	CONFERENCE

Outline of Main Topics – Courtenay Students

Week of (Tues)	Tuesday Lecture (view the following lecture on D2L in preparation for the seminar; each lecture will be ready for viewing on the Tuesday before the date specified for it below)	Tuesday Evening Seminar
Jan 7	No video.	Renaissance Art (see the D2L site for images)
Jan 14	Christianity: The narrative of exit and return (Maureen and Mark)	The Gospel According to John; Paul's Epistle to the Romans
Jan 21	Augustine: A journey of reason and faith (Mark)	Augustine: Confessions (s ee the 'Booklist' section above for selections)
Jan 28	Islam and The Qur'an (Mark)	Approaching The Qur'an
Feb 4	Meister Eckhart and Medieval Art (Maureen)	Meister Eckhart; Medieval Art Images (see the D2L site for readings and images)
Feb 11	Sir Gawain and the Green Knight (Maureen)	Sir Gawain and the Green Knight
Feb 18	Dante's Journey to Hell (Maureen)	Dante: Inferno
Feb 25	STUDY WEEK	STUDY WEEK
Mar 4	Machiavelli (Mark)	The Prince
Mar 11	Daniel Defoe: Voyage into Homo Economicus (Janice Porteous)	Robinson Crusoe
Mar 18	Marlowe and Galileo (Maureen)	Marlowe, Dr Faustus ; Galileo, "Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina" (see D2L for reading)
Mar 25	Shakespeare (Maureen) Montaigne and Renaissance Art (Mark)	The Tempest ; Montaigne, Essays (selections t.b.a.)
Apr 1	Descartes: an Interior Journey (Mark)	Meditations on First Philosophy
Apr 8-10	CONFERENCE	CONFERENCE

Liberal Studies Essay Grading Guidelines

The A Paper

has a well-defined focus and a strong thesis.
provides a strong introduction and conclusion.
presents careful, original, and creative thinking.
displays a smooth, logical, and coherent organization of the material. The reader does not stumble or hesitate over the sequence of facts or ideas.
gives relevant and sufficient supporting evidence that is used consistently.
is written in an informative and thoughtful manner. Examples or comparisons are carefully chosen. Occasionally there is a vivid image or deft comparison.
conveys immediately a sense of person behind the words: an individual voice speaking firmly and clearly from the page.
has varied sentences, with rhythm and emphasis appropriate to the meaning. Phrasing is often fluent, even graceful. Sentences read well aloud, and are structured in a sophisticated way.
uses well-chosen words that are accurate and sensitive to connotations.
demonstrates depth of reading of the relevant material and uses a vocabulary and a conceptual framework consistent with the level of the course.
has very few mechanical errors [grammar, punctuation, and spelling].
uses punctuation that is appropriate and helpful to the reader.

A-range research papers also incorporate carefully chosen secondary source arguments into the paper in a fluid, thoughtful, clear, and relevant manner.

The B Paper

has many of the characteristics of the A paper but may be somewhat uneven in quality.
has reasonably sound content that may be a little thin. Examples or illustrations may be slightly forced or exaggerated.
is generally clearly organized so that the reader does not stumble over sequence.
may display less creativity or sophistication in its reading of sources than an A-range paper.
may have a weak introduction or conclusion.
uses relevant supporting evidence consistently, but not always sufficiently.
has only, at most, minor mechanical errors [grammar, spelling, or punctuation] that do not interfere with the flow of the argument or the intellectual focus of the paper.
has a workable thesis.
uses words clearly, although phrasing may be pedestrian, awkward, or wordy.

B-range research papers also correctly cite secondary sources, but the research element is less engaged than in an "A" paper: it does little to extend the work beyond basic understanding of secondary sources.

The C Paper

lacks engagement with the material and may be characterized by insufficiently developed thought.
may present adequate information and ideas that are nonetheless thin or unconvincing.
has a thesis, but one that may need more explanation or supporting evidence, that is too narrow to be arguable, or that is too broad to be adequately supported. The argument may suffer from some inconsistency or irrelevancy.
might lack an introduction or conclusion.
might have a structure that is not entirely coherent.
may summarize rather than analyse narrative (especially for papers on literature).
may make assertions without argument or defence.
occasionally shows unclear organization, causing the reader to stop and re-read previous material to be sure of meaning.
presents sentences with little or no structural variety.
may be characterized by wordiness, clichés, or poor word choices. Unnecessary words and phrases make the writing loose.
may have several mechanical errors: grammar (such as fragments, run-on or fused sentences, subject/verb agreement problems, comma splices, reference errors), spelling, and punctuation errors that hinder the reader's ability to follow the argument easily, and demand editorial correction for clarity.

C-range research papers

may also make arbitrary references to secondary sources, as if filling a quota.
may also use secondary sources to substantiate obvious points of exegesis, or in place of a close reading of the primary text.
may also make vague or non-specific references to a secondary source.

The D Paper

shows limited knowledge of the subject matter.
has a thesis that is extremely weak or has no thesis.
has little evidence or generally irrelevant evidence.
may suffer from serious inconsistency.
is cluttered by technical errors that overwhelm readers' ability to make sense of the writing. The paper may make some sense, but only when the reader struggles to find the sense. Writers of "D" papers have little control of their material.
may not answer the question to which the paper is a response.

D-range research papers also have poorly chosen sources that are inadequate, or not fully documented. Secondary source references appear arbitrarily selected, as if the writer is filling a quota. Secondary sources may be used to substantiate obvious points of exegesis or in place of reading the primary text.

The F Paper (any of the following is reason for a failing grade)

shows inadequate knowledge of the subject matter.
inadequately addresses the question.
does not have a thesis or has an inappropriate thesis for the topic.
has serious structural problems.
is incoherent and confusing.
has an excessive number of technical errors.

The Liberal Studies Department would like to acknowledge and thank the English Department at VIU for the use of their excellent grading guidelines in developing the above.